← Circles and connections

The royal line: Judah to David to Jesus

Key links in the Davidic genealogy as given by Ruth 4, 1 Chronicles 3, Matthew 1 and Luke 3.

Judah to David: Ruth 4 and Matthew 1Judah to David: Ruth 4 and Matthew 1Judah to David: Ruth 4 and Matthew 1Judah to David: Ruth 4 and Matthew 1Judah to David: Ruth 4 and Matthew 1Judah to David: Ruth 4 and Matthew 1Jehoiachin's curse and the Davidic hopeThe Davidic covenant: from 2 Samuel 7 to the New TestamentThe Davidic covenant: from 2 Samuel 7 to the New TestamentThe Davidic covenant: from 2 Samuel 7 to the New TestamentJudahIsraelite tribe, kingdom, and provincePerezSon of Judah, ancestor of David and JesusBoazKinsman-redeemer who married Ruth, ancestor of David and JesusDavidAnointed king of Israel, ancestor of Jesus ChristSolomonSon of David, king of Israel, known for his wisdom.NathanProphet during the reigns of David and Solomon.RehoboamSon of Solomon, first king of JudahHezekiahA righteous king of Judah.JosiahKing of Judah known for his religious reformsJehoiachinKing of Judah, son of JehoiakimShealtielGrandfather of Zerubbabel, descendant of DavidZerubbabelLeader of the first Jewish exiles from BabylonJesusThe Son of God and Savior of the world.JosephHusband of Mary and earthly father of Jesus
Links shared by the whole circle are listed below rather than drawn.FamilyRoleSolid line = stated or widely accepted · dashed = tradition, debate or hypothesis

Who is connected to whom

PersonConnections in this circle
Judah
Son of Israel
Perez
Son of Judah
Boaz
Son of Salmon
David
King of Judah
Solomon
King of Judah
Nathan
A prophet
Rehoboam
King of Judah
Hezekiah
King of Judah
Josiah
King of Judah
Jehoiachin
King of Judah
Shealtiel
Grandfather of Zerubbabel
Zerubbabel
Governor
Jesus
Son of Joseph
Joseph
Mary's husband

The evidence, connection by connection

Judah to David: Ruth 4 and Matthew 1

FamilyStated in the text

Ruth 4:18-22 lists ten generations from Perez to David, matching Matthew 1:3-6 and Luke 3:31-33. Scholars note that ten names cover about seven centuries, so the list is likely selective.

Where the text shows it: Ruth 4:18-22 — Perez to David1 Chr 2:5-15 — Chronicles parallelMatt 1:3-6 — Matthew's versionLuke 3:31-33 — Luke's version

Sources: Ruth 4:18-22 · 1 Chr 2:5-15 · Matt 1:3-6 · Luke 3:31-33

David to Jesus through Solomon (Matthew)

FamilyStated in the text

Matthew traces the royal line from David through Solomon and the kings of Judah to Jehoiachin, then through Shealtiel and Zerubbabel to Joseph, husband of Mary. It lists fourteen generations in each of three groups, selectively.

Where the text shows it: Matt 1:6-11 — David to JeconiahMatt 1:12-16 — Jeconiah to Joseph and JesusMatt 1:17 — Three sets of fourteen generations

Sources: Matt 1:6-11 · Matt 1:12-16 · Matt 1:17

David to Jesus through Nathan (Luke)

FamilyDebated

Luke's genealogy runs from David through his son Nathan, not Solomon, and also includes Shealtiel and Zerubbabel. Views differ whether Luke gives Mary's line or Joseph's legal line, with the two crossing at Shealtiel.

Where the text shows it: Luke 3:23-31 — Jesus back to David through Nathan2 Sam 5:14 — Nathan is a son of David born in JerusalemZech 12:12 — The family of the house of Nathan mentioned
Ways people read this (3)
  • Julius Africanus (third century) proposed levirate marriages explaining the differences between Matthew and Luke.
  • Many later interpreters take Luke as Mary's line (Heli as her father), though the text says "son of Heli" of Joseph.
  • Others think Matthew gives the royal succession and Luke the physical descent, both through Joseph.

Sources: Luke 3:23-31 · 2 Sam 5:14 · Zech 12:12

Jehoiachin's curse and the Davidic hope

RoleDebated

Jeremiah 22:30 says none of Jehoiachin's descendants would sit on David's throne, yet Matthew 1 places him in Jesus' legal line. Luke's different route through Nathan is sometimes used to explain the tension; others note that the oracle concerns Jehoiachin's immediate sons.

Where the text shows it: Jer 22:24-30 — Judgement on ConiahMatt 1:11-12 — Jeconiah in the genealogyHag 2:23 — Zerubbabel as signet
Ways people read this (2)
  • Some hold that Matthew gives Jesus' legal right through Joseph and Luke the physical line avoids the curse.
  • Others argue the curse was specific to Jehoiachin's lifetime and was reversed by his release and Zerubbabel's appointment.

Sources: Jer 22:24-30 · Matt 1:11-12 · Hag 2:23

The Davidic covenant: from 2 Samuel 7 to the New Testament

RoleWidely accepted

God promised David a house and a throne "forever" through his descendant. Psalm 89 and Isaiah 9 and 11 develop this, and Luke 1:32-33 and Acts 2:30 apply it to Jesus; Jewish readers await a future Davidic king.

Where the text shows it: 2 Sam 7:12-16 — The promisePs 89:3-4 — Covenant with DavidLuke 1:32-33 — Gabriel to MaryActs 2:30 — Peter on David's oath
Ways people read this (2)
  • Christian reading: fulfilled in Jesus as the messianic Son of David.
  • Jewish reading: awaits a future Davidic king; fulfilment in the Davidic dynasty's continuation.

Sources: 2 Sam 7:12-16 · Ps 89:3-4 · Luke 1:32-33 · Acts 2:30

Four women in Matthew's genealogy

FamilyDebated

Matthew names Tamar, Rahab, Ruth and "the wife of Uriah" in a list otherwise of men. Tamar, Rahab and Ruth are likely non-Israelites or of irregular circumstances, and Bathsheba is named by Uriah. Commentators propose that Matthew highlights Gentile inclusion, scandal, or God's use of irregular paths.

Where the text shows it: Matt 1:3 — TamarMatt 1:5 — Rahab and RuthMatt 1:6 — The wife of Uriah
Ways people read this (3)
  • Gentile-inclusion view: the women are foreigners or associated with foreigners (Bathsheba as the wife of a Hittite).
  • Irregularity view: each woman stands in an ambiguous moral or marital situation.
  • Messianic-prophecy view: each story shows God working outside human expectation.

Sources: Matt 1:3 · Matt 1:5 · Matt 1:6

Drafted with AI assistance from the biblical text and named historical sources, and labelled by how firmly each link is supported. Family links also draw on STEPBible’s TIPNR data (CC BY 4.0). Where tradition or hypothesis is involved, read the cited verses and judge for yourself.