Man living at the time of Divided Monarchy
Gamul was the head of the twenty-second priestly division organized during King David's reign.
🗺 Places mentioned alongside Gamul on the map →
Gamul is mentioned briefly in 1Ch.24.17 as the head of the twenty-second division of priests during the reign of King David. David, along with Zadok and Ahimelech, organized the priests into twenty-four divisions to ensure a systematic and orderly service in the tabernacle (and later the temple). Each division was responsible for serving for a specific period, and the order was determined by casting lots (1Ch.24.1-19). Gamul's division would have been responsible for a week of service twice a year, as well as during the major festivals. The organization of the priestly divisions was an important step in establishing a structured and efficient system for worship and sacrifice in ancient Israel. Although no further details are provided about Gamul himself, his inclusion in this list highlights the significance of the priestly role in maintaining the spiritual life of the nation.
More background: search Wikipedia ↗
Weaned the leader of one of the priestly courses (1 Chr. 24:17).
(weaned), a priest, the leader of the twenty-second course in the service at the sanctuary. (1 Chronicles 24:17) (B.C. 535.)
GA'MUL (weaned), the leader of the twenty-second course of the priests. 1 Chr 24:17.
GA'MUL (weaned), the leader of the twenty-second course of the priests. 1 Chr 24:17.
Easton (1897), Smith (1863), Hitchcock (1869), Hastings (1898) and Schaff are in the public domain. Parsed text: neuu-org/bible-dictionary-dataset (CC BY 4.0). Headwords and whitespace normalised for this site.
1 verse in 1 book · English text: BSB (change it from the menu at the top) · Strong’s H1577
the twenty-first to Jachin, the twenty-second to Gamul,
Names, family links and references: STEPBible TIPNR (Tyndale House Cambridge, CC BY 4.0). Short descriptions were drafted with AI assistance by STEPBible. Family links follow STEPBible’s scholarly decisions where genealogies are ambiguous.