← People

Person · Tribe of Judah

Ammizabad

Warrior living at the time of United Monarchy

Ammizabad was the son of Benaiah, one of David's mighty men, and served as his father's second-in-command.

🗺 Places mentioned alongside Ammizabad on the map →

Ammizabad was the son of Benaiah, one of King David's mighty men and the commander of his bodyguard. Benaiah was a valiant warrior known for his heroic deeds. Ammizabad served as his father's second-in-command, assisting him in his duties and responsibilities. This suggests that Ammizabad was also a skilled and trusted military leader, following in his father's footsteps.

Family

Father
Benaiah

Bible dictionary

Ammizabad Easton Easton’s Bible Dictionary (1897)

People of the giver, the son of Benaiah, who was the third and chief captain of the host under David (1 Chr. 27:6).

Read the full entry →

Ammizabad Smith Smith’s Bible Dictionary (1863)

(people of the Giver, i.e. God), the son of Benaiah, who commanded the third division of David’s army. (1 Chronicles 27:6) (B.C. 1050.)

Read the full entry →

Ammizabad Hitchcock Hitchcock’s Bible Names Dictionary (1869)

dowry of the people

Read the full entry →

Ammizabad Hastings Hastings’ Dictionary of the Bible (1898)

AMMIZ'ABAD (people of the Giver, i. e. Jehovah ), an officer in David's army. 1 Chr 27:6.

Read the full entry →

Ammizabad Schaff Schaff’s Dictionary of the Bible

AMMIZ'ABAD (people of the Giver, i. e. Jehovah ), an officer in David's army. 1 Chr 27:6.

Read the full entry →

Easton (1897), Smith (1863), Hitchcock (1869), Hastings (1898) and Schaff are in the public domain. Parsed text: neuu-org/bible-dictionary-dataset (CC BY 4.0). Headwords and whitespace normalised for this site.

Where Ammizabad appears

1 verse in 1 book · English text: BSB (change it from the menu at the top) · Strong’s H5990

1 Chronicles1

Names, family links and references: STEPBible TIPNR (Tyndale House Cambridge, CC BY 4.0). Short descriptions were drafted with AI assistance by STEPBible. Family links follow STEPBible’s scholarly decisions where genealogies are ambiguous.