← People

Person

Biztha

Man living at the time of Exile and Return

Biztha was one of the seven eunuchs who served King Ahasuerus.

🗺 Places mentioned alongside Biztha on the map →

Biztha was one of the seven eunuchs who served in the court of King Ahasuerus, also known as Xerxes, the Persian ruler (Est. 1:10). Eunuchs were often employed in royal courts as trusted officials and servants due to their loyalty and inability to establish a rival dynasty. During a royal feast, when King Ahasuerus was in high spirits from drinking wine, he commanded the seven eunuchs, including Biztha, to bring Queen Vashti before him wearing her royal crown. The king wanted to display her beauty to the people and nobles, but Queen Vashti refused to come (Est. 1:11-12). This refusal led to the king's anger and ultimately to Vashti's removal as queen, setting the stage for the rise of Esther. Biztha's mention as one of the eunuchs highlights the opulence and power dynamics within the Persian court during the time of Esther.

Bible dictionary

Biztha Smith Smith’s Bible Dictionary (1863)

(eunuch), the second of the seven eunuchs of King Ahasuerus’ harem. (Esther 1:10) (B.C. 483.)

Read the full entry →

Biztha Hastings Hastings’ Dictionary of the Bible (1898)

BIZ'THA (eunuch), one of the seven "chamberlains" or eunuchs of Ahasuerus. Esth 1:10.

Read the full entry →

Biztha Schaff Schaff’s Dictionary of the Bible

BIZ'THA (eunuch), one of the seven "chamberlains" or eunuchs of Ahasuerus. Esth 1:10.

Read the full entry →

Easton (1897), Smith (1863), Hitchcock (1869), Hastings (1898) and Schaff are in the public domain. Parsed text: neuu-org/bible-dictionary-dataset (CC BY 4.0). Headwords and whitespace normalised for this site.

Where Biztha appears

1 verse in 1 book · English text: BSB (change it from the menu at the top) · Strong’s H0968

Esther1

Names, family links and references: STEPBible TIPNR (Tyndale House Cambridge, CC BY 4.0). Short descriptions were drafted with AI assistance by STEPBible. Family links follow STEPBible’s scholarly decisions where genealogies are ambiguous.